Author Guidelines
Aims and Scope
The Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies (JEMDS) is a high quality, open access and international refereed journal which aims to publish original research papers, reviews, and case studies related to broad areas of disciplines, including Education, Environment and Natural Resources, Health Sciences, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Public Management, Business Management and Entrepreneurship, Development Management, and Gender and Development. This also covers multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary studies on sustainable development in regional, national and global perspectives.
Special Issues
A "Special Issue," or a collection of papers focused on a particular theme, may be published by the Journal. Alternatively, it can be a compilation of papers from the Conference held in conjunction with this Journal or a related Association. The Journal can then be promoted using this.
Publication Frequency
The publication frequency of the JEMDS journal is Quarterly.
Editorial Procedure
This journal follows a double-blind reviewing procedure. Authors are therefore requested to submit:
- A blinded manuscript with at least 3000 words that does not include the names or affiliations of the authors either in the text or on the title page. In the article text, self-identifying citations and references should be avoided.
- A separate title page with the title, the names of all authors, their affiliations, and their contact details. This page need to contain any acknowledgments, disclosures, or funding details.
The Editorial Office will get in touch with the qualified reviewers that have been identified. After potential reviewers consent to examine a paper, they have a certain amount of time to finish the review. At least two reviewers must be involved, according to the Journal.
Following the completion of the reviews, a choice is made regarding whether to accept the paper, provide the authors the chance to make revisions in accordance with reviewers' recommendations, or reject the work in light of the reviewers' criticisms and the editors' assessment of the paper. In rare cases, it may be necessary to consult with additional reviewers if further input is required before coming to a judgment. An editor sends the decision letter and reviewers' feedback when he has decided on a manuscript. The decision letter and reviewers' feedback are delivered to the author once an editor has decided on a manuscript. You must contact the editorial office immediately with any queries or grievances you may have regarding any manuscript's editorial decision. The evaluation of revised manuscripts looks at how well the authors have responded to the reviewers' and editors' criticism. Manuscripts may be accepted, sent back for additional revision, or rejected based on this assessment. If an article is approved, it is sent to the publication office right away and scheduled for the following issue. Each manuscript is subject to a two- to four-week evaluation and judgment process by the Journal. This period, however, may change based on the volume of editing that must be done before the book is considered acceptable.
Submission Policies/Instruction for Authors
When a manuscript is submitted, it is assumed that the work described has never been published before, is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere, and has received the implicit or explicit approval of all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute where the work was conducted. Should there be any demands for compensation, the publisher shall not be liable.
If it turns out that a manuscript has major issues with its scientific content or that our publishing guidelines have been broken, we reserve the right to reject it even after it has been accepted.
Permissions
When submitting their papers, authors who desire to include images, tables, or text passages that have already been published somewhere else must first get permission from the copyright owner(s) and provide proof of such authorization.
Submission
The provision of all relevant editable source files by authors is required. If certain source files are not submitted, the review and production processes can be delayed needlessly.
Authors must follow the required files and format stated below:
Title Page
Please use this template title page for providing the following information.
The title page should include:
- The name(s) of the author(s)
- A concise and informative title
- The affiliation(s) of the author(s), i.e. institution, (department), city, (state), country
- A clear indication and an active e-mail address of the corresponding author
- If available, the 16-digit ORCID of the author(s)
If the address information is provided with the affiliation(s) it will also be published.
For authors that are (temporarily) unaffiliated we will only capture their city and country of residence, not their e-mail address unless specifically requested.
Abstract
Please provide an abstract of 150 to 250 words. The abstract should not contain any undefined abbreviations or unspecified references.
Keywords
Please provide 4 to 6 keywords that can be used for indexing purposes.
Declarations
All manuscripts must contain the following sections under the heading 'Declarations'.
If any of the sections are not relevant to your manuscript, please include the heading and write 'Not applicable' for that section.
- Funding (information that explains whether and by whom the research was supported)
- Conflicts of interest/Competing interests (include appropriate disclosures)
- Ethics approval (include appropriate approvals or waivers)
- Availability of data and material (data transparency)
- Consent to participate (include appropriate statements)
- Authors' contributions (optional: please review the submission guidelines from the Journal whether statements are mandatory)
- Consent for publication (include appropriate statements)
- Code availability (software application or custom code)
Manuscript
Text Formatting
Manuscripts should be submitted in Word and following the IMRaD (Introduction, Methodology, Results and Discussion) Format.
- Use a normal, plain font (e.g., 10-point Times Roman) for text.
- Use italics for emphasis.
- Use the automatic page numbering function to number the pages.
- Do not use field functions.
- Use tab stops or other commands for indents, not the space bar.
- Use the table function, not spreadsheets, to make tables.
- Use the equation editor or MathType for equations.
- Save your file in docx format (Word 2007 or higher) or doc format (older Word versions).
After Acceptance
Upon acceptance of the article, the author will receive an email where they can download the Copyright Forms and whether they wish to order offprints.
Once the Copyright Forms and Offprints order has been received, your article will be processed and you will receive the proof.
Article Processing Charges
Authors pay a one-time 50USD Article Processing Charge (APC) to cover the costs of peer review administration and management, professional production of articles in PDF and other formats, and dissemination of published papers in various venues addition to other publishing functions.
Copyright transfer
Authors will be asked to transfer copyright of the article to the Publisher by signing the copyright form. This will ensure the widest possible protection and dissemination of information under copyright laws.
Journal Reprint
Journal Reprint can be ordered by means of a printing order form supplied with the proofs with a 10USD charge.
Proof reading
The proof's objective is to examine the text, tables, and figures for completeness and accuracy as well as any typesetting or conversion mistakes. Significant material modifications, such as new findings, corrected values, title changes, and author changes, are not permitted without the Editor's consent.
Authorship principles
These guidelines describe authorship principles and good authorship practices to which prospective authors should adhere to.
Authorship
The Journal and Publisher imply that all authors approved of the paper's substance, provided their explicit approval to its submission, and gained permission from the appropriate individuals at the institute or organization where the research was conducted before the work was submitted.
Authorship is not required for all contributions, according to the Publisher. It is advised that authors follow the authorship standards that apply to their particular field of study. In the lack of explicit recommendations, it is advised to follow these rules:
All authors whose names appear on the submission
- made significant contributions to the work's conception or design, the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, the creation of new software used in the work, or any of these;
- drafted the piece of work or critically reviewed it for significant intellectual content;
- authorized the published version; and
- agree to accept responsibility for all facets of the work in order to guarantee that any concerns about the accuracy or integrity of any component of the work are duly examined and addressed.
Disclosures and declarations
All authors are asked to provide information on funding sources, financial and non-financial interests, study-specific ethics committee permission for research involving people and/or animals, informed consent if participants were human, and an animal welfare statement if participants were animals (as appropriate).
The article's scope as well as the Journal's scope have a role in determining whether such material should be published. All authors are responsible for including the proper disclosures and statements when submitting work for publication that may have an impact on the public health or general welfare.
Data transparency
It is required of all authors to ensure that all data, materials, software, and custom code support their published claims and adhere to industry standards.
Corresponding Author
As the designated Corresponding Author, he/she speaks and acts on behalf of the other co-authors to ensure that concerns about the correctness or reliability of any aspect of the work are properly handled.
The Corresponding Author is responsible for the following requirements:
- confirming that the manuscript's submission has been approved by all stated authors, including the names and order of authors;
- coordinating all pre- and post-publication correspondence between the Journal and each co-author;
- ensuring that the appropriate disclosures, declarations, and data openness statements from each author are included in the paper.
A Contact or Submitting Author may be given the responsibility of handling all correspondence between the Journal and all co-authors during submission and proofing. In this situation, please make sure the manuscript clearly identifies the Corresponding Author..
Affiliation
The institution where the majority of each author's work was completed should be listed as their principal affiliation. The author's current address may also be mentioned if they have since moved. Addresses won't be modified or updated once the article is published.
Changes to authorship
It is strongly encouraged for authors to double-check the correct author group, the Corresponding Author, and the author order before submitting their work. After a paper has been accepted, modifications to the authorship by adding or removing authors, changing the corresponding author, changing the order of the authors, etc. are not allowed.
Deceased or incapacitated authors
If the co-authors feel it is appropriate to include the author after the co-author passes away or becomes incapacitated during the writing, submission, or peer-review process, they should get permission from a (legal) representative, who could be a close relative.
Authorship issues or disputes
Unless express permission has been granted to share information, authors should treat all correspondence with the Journal as confidential, including communications with the Editor-in-Chief, Editors, and reviewers' reports.
Confidentiality
Unless express permission has been granted to share information, authors should treat all correspondence with the Journal as confidential, including communications with the Editor-in-Chief, Editors, and reviewers' reports.
Conflict of Interest
Any potential conflict of interest related to the paper must be disclosed by all authors, representatives, reviewers, and editors. Additionally, authors are required to give credit to all sources of funding for their work.
If a reviewer, editor, or editorial board member has a bias or personal interest that could impede peer review, this is an example of academic conflict of interest, and they should disclose this and decline to participate in the review process.
Ethics & Disclosures
The Journal is dedicated to upholding the highest standard of integrity in all published material.
The submissions may be checked for plagiarism using special software such as Turnitin by the Journal. The plagiarism policies shall be adhered to if plagiarism is found.
Action for Plagiarism
The Editorial Board will refer the case to the ethics committee for investigation the instant any article published in the journal database is claimed to have been plagiarized. The Journal must support the original author and manuscript regardless of the publisher if it has been proven that the material contains plagiarism. The Journal may then take any or all of the following immediate actions or adopt the further course of action that the committee advises:
- To take strong action against the concerned author, the Editorial Board will promptly get in touch with the College, Institution, Organization, or University that the author(s) is(are) involved with.
- The journal must retract the previously published journal and republish a revised journal with the copied manuscript deleted.
- The Journal may prohibit authors permanently or reject all of their future contributions for a period of ten years.
Any other course of action that the Committee may recommend, may be regarded appropriate in the given circumstance, or may occasionally be chosen by the Editorial Board.