Water Hyacinth (Eichornia Crassipes) Cellulose and Mung Beans (Viga Radiata) Starch as Composite Plant Bag with Plasticizer Glycerol
PDF

Keywords

bioplastic
cellulose-starch blend
water hyacinth
mung bean
glycerol
plant bag

How to Cite

Tataro- Samillano, R., Obis, M. M., Oliva, M., & Osea, R. (2024). Water Hyacinth (Eichornia Crassipes) Cellulose and Mung Beans (Viga Radiata) Starch as Composite Plant Bag with Plasticizer Glycerol. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies, 4(4), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.52631/jemds.v4i4.310

Abstract

Cellulose-starch blend was the remedy to the stark environmental issues of petrochemical-based plant bag (Technavio, 2019; Blick et al., 2014). Using the Randomized Complete Block Design, this study prompted to design a composite plant bag made of mung bean starch and water hyacinth cellulose with plasticizer glycerol. The study involves the investigation of the best ratio of cellulose-starch in producing plant bag, evaluation of the intrinsic attributes of the different ratio in terms of their tensile strength, elongation, swelling behavior, and biodegradability, and lastly, its significant difference to the pure starch-based plant bag on the said properties. The researchers prepared five treatments: four experimental (cellulose-starch mixture) and one control (pure starched mixture); each has four replicates. Researchers used two sample unpaired t-test and Likert scale to assess the intrinsic attributes of each treatment. The results unveiled that the ratio 8:2 of mung bean starch and water hyacinth cellulose respectively yields the best mixture among the treatments. It has a tensile strength, elongation, and swelling percentage of 40 MPa, 40% and 160% respectively and was degraded under laboratory condition (thoroughly assessed through their thickness, decolorization and tearing apart after the introduction of microbial solution on it). It was also significantly better than the pure starched-mixture having a t-computed value of t (2) = 3.52, 4.51, 2.90 and 0, p<.05 respectively. The researchers concluded that the higher the concentration amount of water hyacinth cellulose on the system, the higher the tensile strength, elongation, swelling percentage, and the longer its shelf life.

https://doi.org/10.52631/jemds.v4i4.310
PDF

References

Aranda-García, F. J., González-Núñez, R., Jasso-Gastinel, C. F., & Mendizábal, E. (2015). Water Absorption and Thermomechanical Characterization of Extruded Starch/Poly(lactic acid)/Agave Bagasse Fiber Bioplastic Composites. International Journal of Polymer Science, 2015, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/343294

Ashori, A., & Bahrami, R. (2014). Modification of Physico-Mechanical Properties of Chitosan-Tapioca Starch Blend Films Using Nano Graphene. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 53, 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2013.866246

Biona, J. B. M. M., Gonzaga, J. A., Ubando, A. T., & Tan, H. C. (2015). A comparative life cycle analysis of plastic and paper packaging bags in the Philippines. 2015 International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology,Communication and Control, Environment and Management (HNICEM). https://doi.org/10.1109/hnicem.2015.7393237

Bulaon-Ducusin, G. (2018). DOST-developed biodegradable substitute to synthetic plastics offers opportunity for plastic manufacturers. stii.dost.gov.ph. https://stii.dost.gov.ph/808-dost-developed-biodegradable-substitute-to-synthetic-plastics-offers-opportunity-for-plastic-manufacturers

Dafader, N. C., Adnan, M. N., Haque, M. E., Huq, D., & Akhtar, F. (2011). Study on the properties of copolymer hydrogel obtained from acrylamide/2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) by the application of gamma radiation. https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJPAC/article-full-text-pdf/B72A2582558

Department of Science and Technology. (2014). DOST’s Textile Institute makes tropical fiber processing cheaper, easier. In Philippine Textile Research Institute. https://www.ptri.dost.gov.ph/s-t/2-transparency-seal/uncategorised/95-dost-s-textile-institute-makes-tropical-fiber-processing-cheaper-easier. https://www.ptri.dost.gov.ph/s-t/2-transparency-seal/uncategorised/95-dost-s-textile-institute-makes-tropical-fiber-processing-cheaper-easier

Encinar, J. M., & González, J. F. (2008). Pyrolysis of synthetic polymers and plastic wastes. Kinetic study. Fuel Process. Technol., 89(7), 678–686.

Fathanah, U., Lubis, M. R., & Ryan Moulana, R. (2015). BIOPOLYMER FROM STARCH AND CHITOSAN AS BIOPLASTIC MATERIAL FOR FOOD PACKAGING. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/172998-EN-biopolymer-from-starch-and-chitosan-as-b.pdf

Gautam, R., Bassi, A. S., & Yanful, E. K. (2007). A review of biodegradation of synthetic plastic and foams. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 141, 85–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-007-9212-6

Ginting, M. H., Tarigan, M. F. R., & Singgih, A. M. (2015). Effect of Gelatinization Temperature and Chitosan on Mechanical Properties of Bioplastics from Avocado Seed Starch (Persea americana mill) with Plasticizer Glycerol. https://www.theijes.com/papers/v4-i12/Version-2/F041202036043.pdf.

greenconvergence. (2016). Mongo Industry in the Philippines. Green Convergence For safe food, healthy environment. https://greenconvergencephil.com/mongo-industry-in-the-philippines/

Hasan, M., Rahmayani, R. F. I., & Munandar. (2018). Bioplastic from Chitosan and Yellow Pumpkin Starch with Castor Oil as Plasticizer. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 333, 012087. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/333/1/012087

Knorr. (2025). Kid-Friendly Ginisang Monggo Recipe. knorr. https://www.knorr.com/ph/recipes/recipe-tips/ginisang-monggo-recipe.html

Marichelvam, M. K., Jawaid, M., & Asim, M. (2019). Corn and Rice Starch-Based Bio-Plastics as Alternative Packaging Materials. Fibers, 7, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/fib7040032

Ribba, L., Garcia, N. L., D’Accorso, N., & Goyanes, S. (2017). Disadvantages of Starch-Based Materials, Feasible Alternatives in Order to Overcome These Limitations. Starch-Based Materials in Food Packaging, 37–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809439-6.00003-0

Rodriquez, J. C. (2013). PH firm launches alternative to plastic bag. In ABS-CBN News. https://news.abs-cbn.com. https://news.abs-cbn.com

Sapp, M. (2025). Philippines plastic manufacture goes bio with starch-based biodegradable plastics. Biofuels Digest. Bohrpub.com. https://journals.bohrpub.com/index.php/bijcees/article/view/456/3589

SeniChev, V. Y., & Tereshatov, V. V. (2012). Theories of Compatibility. Elsevier EBooks, 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-895198-50-8.50008-4

Sunnexdesk. (2014). Mung bean, the cheapest protein source. SunStar Publishing Inc. https://www.sunstar.com.ph/article/382161

Thapa, B., & Narain, R. (2016). Mechanism, current challenges and new approaches for non viral gene delivery. Polymers and Nanomaterials for Gene Therapy, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100520-0.00001-1

Vieira, M. G. A., da Silva, M. A., dos Santos, L. O., & Beppu, M. M. (2011). Natural-based plasticizers and biopolymer films: A review. European Polymer Journal, 47, 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2010.12.011

Villanueva, R. (2015). ‘Philippines placing 3rd in plastic ocean list a wake-up call.’ Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2015/02/26/1427519/philippines-placing-3rd-plastic-ocean-list-

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...