Keywords
CDIO Standards
Engineering Education
Extent of Compliance
Self-evaluation
How to Cite
Abstract
CDIO (Conceive, Design, Implement and Operate) emphasizes new approaches in engineering education, and provides students better learning experiences which will prepare them into the real-world of engineering works. This CDIO approach has been adopted by several universities around the world. In the Philippines, this approach has been introduced to several universities and colleges more specifically to engineering programs. Engineering programs at Camarines Sur Polytechnic has been in its third-year since its introduction of CDIO in 2017. This study was developed to evaluate the current state of the engineering programs on how well it lines up with the 12 CDIO standards using the CDIO’s 6-level self-evaluation rubric. Results showed that there are improvements on the ratings in 2020 as compared in 2017 where CDIO framework was first introduced in engineering programs. Standards 4, 5, 9, 10 and 11 were rated 4 which confirmed that the engineering program complies with the standards. Standards 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8 and 12 were rated 3 which confirmed that further development and improvement in these standards are sought. Compliance and alignment of CDIO standards to Commission on Higher Education (CHED) standards and quality assurance systems including Accrediting Agency of Chartered Colleges and Universities in the Philippines (AACCUP) and Philippine Technological Council (PTC) has been presented and found that CDIO standards conforms with the various quality assurance systems. Plans of action were developed for continuous improvement processes.
References
Armstrong Perry, Bankel Johan, Gunnarsson Svante, Keesee John, & Oosthuizen Pat. (2006). Meeting the CDIO requirements: an international comparison of engineering curricula. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 5(2), 263–266.
Brodeur, D., & Crawley, E. (2009, July). CDIO and Quality Assurance: Using the Standards for Continuous Program Improvement. In (pp. 211–222). doi: doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0555-0 _17
Campbell, D., Dawes, L., Beck, H., Wallace, S., Boman, M., & Reidsema, C. (2009). Graduate attribute mapping with the extended CDIO framework. In Proc. 20th Australasian Assoc. for Engng. Educ. Conf. Citeseer.
The CDIO Method. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.cdio.org/framework-benefits/ teaching-learning-reform
CDIO Standards. (2004). Retrieved from http://www.cdio.org/
CDIO Standards 2.0. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.cdio.org/implementingcdio/standards/12-cdio-standards
CDIO Standards 2.0. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.cdio.org/implementing-cdio/standards/12-cdio-standards
Choo, K., Tan, D., Chong, J., & Wee, K. (2015, June). CDIO and ABET Accreditation – The Nanyang Polytechnic Experience..
Chuchalin, P., Petrovskaya, T., Kulyukina, E., & Tayurskaya, M. (2012, July). Benchmarking of TPU Academic Standard and CDIO Standards in Engineering Education..
Crawley, E. F., & Brodeur, D. (2005, June). Program Evaluation Aligned With The Cdio Standards. In 2005 Annual Conference Proceedings (pp. 10.1028.1–10.1028.18). Portland, Oregon: ASEE Conferences. Retrieved 2023-02-21, from http://peer.asee.org/15474 doi: doi: 10.18260/1-2--15474
Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators 2002. (2011). Washington: Organization for Economic Cooperation & Development. (OCLC: 552002428)
Gray, P. J. (2012). CDIO standards and quality assurance: From application to accreditation. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education (IJQAETE), 2(2), 1–8.
Kontio, J., Roslöf, J., Edström, K., Naumann, S., Hussmann, P., Schrey, K., & Karhu, M. (2012, August). Improving Quality Assurance with CDIO Self-Evaluation: Experiences From a Nordic Project. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 2, 55–66. doi: doi: 10.4018/ijqaete.2012040106
Kristensen, B. (2010, July). Has External Quality Assurance Actually Improved Quality in Higher Education Over the Course of 20 Years of the ‘Quality Revolution’? Quality in Higher Education,16(2), 153–157. Retrieved 2023-02-21, from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/
1080/13538322.2010.485732 doi: doi: 10.1080/13538322.2010.485732
Marr, B. (2016, June). What Everyone Must Know About Industry 4.0. Retrieved from https:// www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2016/06/20/what-everyonemust-know -about-industry-4-0/#511dab77795f
Nhi, N., Thai, T., Pham, H., & Nguyen, G. (2020, September). CDIO Approach in Developing Teacher Training Program to Meet Requirement of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 in Vietnam. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15, 108. doi: doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i18.15517
Norinpel, E., Gonchigsumlaa, K., Tungalag, U., & Purevdorj, U. (2018, October). CDIO Based Curriculum Design and Development of Undergraduate Program..
Onwuegbuzie, A., & Weinbaum, R. (2017, February). A Framework for Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis for the Review of the Literature. The Qualitative Report, 22, 359–372. doi: doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2175
Patil, A. S., & Gray, P. (Eds.). (2009). Engineering education quality assurance: a global perspective. Dordrecht ; New York: Springer. (OCLC: ocn416292125)
Patton, M. Q., & Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3ed ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
Personal and Professional Skills & Attributes. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.cdio.org/participate/instructor-resource-materials/personal-andprofessional-skills-attributes
Platanitis, G., & Pop-Iliev, R. (2011, June). Self Evaluation for Compliance with the 12 CDIO Standards. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association. doi: doi: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3596
Self Evaluation by the CDIO Standards (template) | Worldwide CDIO Initiative. (n.d.). Retrieved 2023-02-21, from http://www.cdio.org/node/6011
Sotto, R. J., Barandon, S., Bustamante, J., Luzon, A., Pontillas, M., & Terano, H. J. (2021, September). Possible Scenarios on the Future of Polytechnic State University of Bicol (PSUB) – Research Culture by 2030 using Jim Dator’s Archetypes of Alternative Futures. Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies, 1(2), 40–51. Retrieved 2023-03-13, from https:// journals.cspc.edu.ph/index.php/jemds/article/view/26 doi: doi: 10.52631/jemds.v1i2.26
Terano, H. J. R. (2018, November). Development and Effectiveness of the Simplified Textbook in Advanced Mathematics for Engineering Programs in One State College in the Philippines. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 23(1-3). Retrieved 2023-03-13, from http://krepublishers.com/02-Journals/IJES/IJES-23-0-000-18-Web/IJES-23-0-000-18-Contents/IJES-23-0-000-18-Contents.htm doi: doi:10.31901/24566322.2018/23.1-3.1069
Terano, H. J. R. (2019). Development of Integrated Curricula for the Master of Engineering Programs using the CDIO Framework. Int. J. Eng. Pedagog., 9(3), 44–55.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Education, Management and Development Studies